These are themes which interest Dyer and make him an appropriate author of the topic. Overall, her book was persuading and convincing and opened my eyes to an idea I never thought of before. When putting all this together, Hoganson wants to show just how important a role manhood has had in our history.
Despite his war record, however, McKinley was perceived as a soft, old man and critics noted his cabinet officers were mostly over sixty years of age.
The significantly gendered rhetoric that surrounded the conflict betrays the degree to which advocates of war such as Teddy Roosevelt, Albert Beveridge, and Alfred Theyer Mahan used the notion of strong and assertive manhood to bring together supporters with vastly different interests behind the cause of war.
After a brief, one-sided armed conflict, the U. Magazine Articles Teaching with Images Passportp. Yale University Press, Oct 14, Hotavio rated it really liked it Recommended to Hotavio by: Cuba Libre and the other reasons for intervention paled beside the affront to American honor and manhood.
Journal Articles Meat in the Middle: The United States realized a big shift in domestic and foreign policy the turn of the 20th century. While the two books have fundamental differences, they are linked together through their specialized take on a common historical subject.
Transnational American Studies edited by Udo Hebel. When McKinley attempted to find a peaceful resolution with Spainhe was rebuffed. Hoganson argues that gender politics played a major role in forcing American into the Spanish American and Philippine wars.
Hoganson and Thomas G. The Congress voted unanimously for war. With these concerns in mind, the authors provide a cogent reassessment on the topics of the Spanish American War, colonialism, and Theodore Roosevelt.
During the late nineteenth century the United States was a society in flux. Ironically, the plight of the mixed blood Cuban rebels gained support in the U.Hoganson, Kristin: Fighting for American Manhood, Yale, Hoganson subtitles her book, “How Gender Politics Provoked the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars.” She posits that foreign policy did not exist in a vacuum, but was affected by the culture that surrounded it (2).
Fighting for American Manhood Kristin Hoganson has a very interesting idea, which she defends very well with a lot of evidence.
Hoganson argues that gender politics played a major role in forcing American into the Spanish American and Philippine wars. Fighting for American Manhood: How Gender Politics Provoked the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars New Haven Yale University Press American Empire at the Turn of the Twentieth Century Boston Bedford/St.
Martin's "Kristin Hoganson’s Fighting for American Manhood brings the conceptual weapon of gender theory, which is relatively new to diplomatic history, to the frayHoganson’s account is the most ambitious attempt thus far to demonstrate the importance of gender as a foreign policy explanation.
Précis 1 Fighting for American Manhood Kristin Hoganson has a very interesting idea, which she defends very well with a lot of evidence.
Hoganson argues that gender politics played a major role in forcing American into the Spanish American and Philippine wars. proving one's manhood was a national obsession-this thesis provides a critical window through which we can reconstruct their motivations for fighting in America's first overseas war.Download